Case Study

Interdisciplinary Research Published When No Single Discipline Fit

How a paper spanning technology and social sciences found the right interdisciplinary journal.

Journal
[Interdisciplinary Journal]
Indexing
SCI / SSCI Q2
Domain
Interdisciplinary
Timeline
~5 Months

The Researcher's Starting Point

A researcher working at the intersection of technology adoption and behavioural economics had a manuscript that kept getting desk rejected — technology journals said it was too behavioural, and economics journals said it was too technical. After 3 rejections, the researcher was ready to give up.

Challenges Identified

Key Issues

  • 3 desk rejections from single-discipline journals
  • Paper genuinely sat between disciplines with no obvious home
  • Framing kept shifting between technical and social science language
  • Researcher losing confidence in the publishability of the work

How We Supported the Manuscript

Research Ramp's Role

  • Interdisciplinary Journal Identification: Mapped journals that explicitly welcome cross-disciplinary work
  • Unified Framing: Established a primary discipline (social science) with technology as the application context, rather than trying to serve both equally
  • Theoretical Anchoring: Grounded the study in a recognised behavioural theory to give social science reviewers a familiar framework
  • Methodology Clarity: Ensured the technical methodology was explained accessibly for non-technical reviewers
  • Confidence Rebuilding: Demonstrated through journal analysis that the 3 rejections were scope mismatches, not quality issues

Publication Timeline

Month 1
Interdisciplinary journal mapping and framing decision
Month 2
Unified restructuring with behavioural science primary framing
Month 2.5
Submitted to interdisciplinary Q2 journal
Month 4
Minor revisions — clarification of technical methodology
Month 5
Accepted

Outcome

Result

Paper accepted in [Interdisciplinary Journal] (SCI / SSCI Q2) within ~5 Months.

Academic Integrity Disclaimer

  • The researcher maintained full intellectual ownership throughout the process
  • Research Ramp's role was limited to strategic publication guidance and editorial support
  • All data collection, analysis, and core research decisions were made by the researcher
  • Client details are anonymised to protect confidentiality

Working on Interdisciplinary Research?

Get a free consultation to discuss your manuscript, target journals, and timeline. No obligation.

Book Free Consultation
This case study describes Research Ramp's editorial and strategic publication support process. All client details have been anonymised. Research Ramp does not claim authorship of any published work. The researcher retains full intellectual ownership.